Dear Reince (letter I wrote to the GOP when I renewed my membership)

Dear Reince & Company,

I am renewing my membership for 2014 after much soul searching.  However I am only sending the minimum, $30.  My concern is the direction that the party is heading in.  I am seeing two GOPs develop, the people who make up the majority of the party and those in DC that run the party.  This internal conflict is causing the DC elites to attack its own base instead of the democrats.  If you guys in DC were as aggressive with the democrats as you are with the Tea Party, the GOP would be one big happy family!  

How can I, in good conscience support my party when it spends more time and effort attacking a faction of itself rather than the opposing party?  The answer is obvious, I cannot.  I have decided to remain a member in good standing.  My reason is not because I trust you, because I do not.  As an American, I will continue to hold not only liberals accountable for their actions, but also all of the DC elites in the GOP.  I will decide what candidates I support and send money to them myself, no matter if I can vote for them or not.  I also will not blindly vote for anyone, just because there is an R by their name.  If I do not have enough faith in a candidate with an R by their name, I will vote write in or third party.  You can tell me the lie that I will only be voting for the DNC if I do so, but I do not buy that lie.  If I wanted to be in a party that resembled the democratic party light, I would become a democrat conservative.  So I will not empower a Republican party that has shades of blue.  

Let’s start with NO AMNESTY and nothing that resembles amnesty.  People that are here illegally are criminals and get treated as such.  If that creates problems in the job market, well guess what.  We have plenty of uneducated masses here; we do not need millions more!  Start serious welfare cuts, then states can either pick up the slack or let the cuts go through.  This will force people to choose if they want to eat or not.  We cannot continue to support a large and unproductive percentage of the population.  People must do for themselves.  Please do not tell me or fall for the liberal lie, “these people need help, they cannot help themselves.”  With all due respect, I am a junior high dropout; the last grade I finished was 8^th.  I now have a Masters Degree in Business Administration. I worked full time and attended college (full time to half time depending on semester) for 6 years to accomplish this.

Real immigration reform is needed, I realize this.  We can start by putting more strict requirements on someone to be classified a refugee.  When a married woman from Mexico (or any country) can say her husband abused her and then get protection is outrageous!  We could use a point system similar to what Canada has, along with their monetary or job requirements.  We can add a penalty similar to Norway.  If someone is caught illegally in Norway a single time, they can never, under any circumstances ever become a citizen of Norway.  We can switch from right of soil to right of blood.  If you have one parent who is a citizen, you must apply for US citizenship at 18 (expedited case, with no waiting period afterwards), if both parents are citizens at time of birth, you are a naturalized American citizen, no matter where you are born.  If both of your parents are not citizens and you happen to be born here, you are not a citizen, you were just born here.  We MUST secure our border!  Every nation on this planet has the right to a secure border (except for the USA apparently).  

We need to limit Federal power and push back against judicial activism.  Gay marriage and abortion- leave both up to the states to decide.  If someone does not like the laws in their state, they are free to move.  That is a check and balance.  If the state would lose too many citizens that are valuable to their economy, they would be forced to change their laws.  This is how our system was designed to work.  Empower the states, instead of taking away their power.  If a state law has no affect upon any other state, then the Fed has no business getting involved, end of story 10^th Amendment. 

The Federal budget is out of control!  The Federal government has taken on so many responsibilities that it was never designed to do.  Now I realize many of these changes are needed in the modern era.  Still we cannot continue to spend so much money as our debt surpasses 100% of our GDP.  We no longer need a balanced budget; we need a surplus, so we can pay down this debt.   Simple solution to budget and fat Federal government, the Fed budget must be at least 50% to support, supply and pay for active duty military personal.  This would be a great Constitutional Amendment to keep DC on a diet and keep us in line with the intentions of the Constitution.  The military serves the common good, welfare does not.  Let charities do their job, instead of competing against the government.  Charities want to see their need end and for them to be out of a job.  Bureaucrats have no vested interest in ending their careers.  

Stand up to Obama!  He is violating his oath of office by refusing to enforce the laws of the land.  There are many questions when it comes to IRS, Solyndra, Holder perjuries, NSA, Benghazi, AP wire tapping, Fast and Furious, Sebelius (pressuring for donations and questions about violating Hatch), the healthcare.gov website contract, etc... So many scandals that I cannot even keep up with them all!   We must hold this entire administration accountable for its actions!   Use the power of the committees to find the answers and stand up to Obama.  If he will not back down and obey the Constitution.  Well then even though we cannot obviously impeach him, since the DNC is sticking together to try to hold onto power.  You can then take all the committee findings to the American people, especially the most damning ones.  We will see how the American people react when the golden boy is suddenly tarnished.  Yes I know I am not showing any respect to the President, but not since Wilson has there been such an orchestrated attack on the Constitution.  Wilson at least had the grace to do it under the pretense of being needed to win the First World War (like Americans need an excuse to go kick some ass).  

Sir, the divide between left and right is growing so large that I am not even sure if it can be bridged.  I am sure of one thing though, my back is against the wall.  The only way we can give the left anymore of what they want is by burning our Constitution.  If there is not a backlash in DC, led by the GOP the backlash will happen in the states.  All it will take is one state to decide on secession and I believe many states will begin to fall like dominos.  I will support any action that will preserve the Constitution in 1 to all 50 states, but never the liberal interpretation of our Constitution.  

Yes I am angry and you may even be correct if you say I am irrational.  Yet was it truly rational when our Founding Fathers decided to fight the most power country on the planet for their independence?  We are not facing basic human rights issues that Lincoln faced (though state’s rights were also a sticking point).  This time we are talking about the most basic ideals that this nation was founded upon.  Are we going to stick with them or abandon them?  Is the GOP going to fight for what it supposedly stands for or will it choose to attack its own members in an effort to keep them in line?  The backbone of America is not the 47% that do not pay taxes; it is not the 53% that do pay taxes.  It is not even the top 10%, top 1% or the businesses that have grown into mega corporations thanks to our business friendly environment.  The backbone of American is the ideals that are found within the US Constitution, without that we have no spine.  I hope the GOP finds its spine.

Sincerely,

Room 101

short e-mail I sent to Coca Cola

I am extremely offended by your Superbowl commercial!  Diet Coke is one of my addictions that I thought I could never do without and now I will seek an alternative.  This advertisement is nothing but Politically Correct garbage!  If you are going to cater to a particular social segment of society then you have to expect a backlash from the other segments.  It is obvious that you have no idea what pride is in the USA.

Yes the USA is the melting pot, but from this advertisement it is obvious that you do not understand the concept.  The USA is a land of immigrants.  These immigrants adapt to the USA culture and add to the mix by being who they are.  Your ad promotes hundreds of separate USAs.  This is the problem with the liberal left.  I am honestly ashamed of the 48-72 cans of Diet Coke I have drank for the past two decades.

Thanks for nothing!

Copy of email I sent to my DC reps #NoAmnesty

Senator Stinker,

As one of your constituents I am voicing my opinion on the immigration reform bill.  No Amnesty, no partial recognition, no nothing for the law breakers!  These people have disrespected our laws and we are going to grant them a legal status because the President will not fulfill his duty and enforce the laws of the land?  I am sorry, but NO!  To give the illegals any status is the same as a criminal getting caught with a stolen flat screen television by the police and instead of arresting them, the officer gives them a Blu-ray player and cable box.  How can we expect anyone to respect our laws if we do not set a firm example?

These illegals are mostly uneducated, not even having the most basic high school education.  This massive influx of unskilled labor will only flood the market with individuals that will not help our economy.  This will create a downward pressure on wages at a time when the labor participation rate is the lowest it has been since the Carter years.  We need real immigration reform.  We need a point system like Canada.  If you do not have enough points and money to support yourself and family while searching for a job, you cannot get a visa.  If someone does not have enough points, but they have a job skill that is in a category that is needed in the USA, they must have a job lined up in advance to just get a work visa.  This must be a job that has not been filled by potential American labor.  The free market can work, if we allow it to.  If jobs are not being filled because they are not paying enough, then instead of flooding the market with cheap labor, those employers need to increase their wages to fill those positions.  We are talking about unskilled labor, not chemists and engineers. 

With a Canadian type point system, we can reward the educated and those who can already read and write English.  We can reward the younger people who have finished school, but cannot find work in their present country.  We can reward families, when both parents are educated.  The point system has worked well for Canada and we can develop one that works well for the USA.

Real immigration reform would involve a one strike and you are out law like Norway has.  In Norway if you are ever caught there illegally just a single time, you are never allowed within their borders again and you have no chance to gain a visa or citizenship for any reason. 

We also need to abandon right of soil and switch to right of blood.  Yet we must make it even more difficult than other blood countries do, to discourage anchor babies.  If one parent is a citizen then the child must apply for citizenship at 18 like anyone else would (with credit being given for time raised in the USA).  If both parents are citizens, then no matter where the child is born, they are a naturalized citizen.

Before anyone can take the oath of citizenship, they need to understand English at a conversational level.  They also need to understand our country's history and the Constitution at a high school level.  If this is not accomplished, they do get the honor of American citizenship.  We also need to discourage pacifist from becoming citizens, if they are not willing to fight for this country, then they should not be allowed to take the oath of citizenship.

I realize that these are extreme steps, but with 5 million to 25 million illegals in the USA, we need to take extreme measures!  We are 17 Trillion in debt and we cannot afford the burden of people that will never be able to give more to our society than they take. 

Thank you,
Room 101 (not going to post my name :P)

Shutdown & letter I wrote to my GOP reps in DC

I can only off my continued support for doing the right thing against Obama and his minions.  I read today that BO will negotiate only after he gets everything he wants. Sorry, but that requires good faith and he deserves none.  He has proven this repeatedly over the past 5 years.  He is also acting like a 2 year old who is throwing a fit because he does not get his way.  Most importantly, he is disrespecting the power of the Congress.  If we had a majority in the Senate, I would say FIRE HIM!  Sad that we do not, because he is obviously out of control.  The House cannot cave in, because it will only make the Executive Branch more powerful than it has ever been at any time since the Woodrow Wilson administration.  I wish I could give you strategy advice, but I am not seeing all of the political chessboard.  I personally do not care if the government must remain shut down for the rest of his administration and even if it delays my entry into law school, what you are doing has become a Constitutional issue and must be won.  This battle is more important than any individual or group, it is for the good and future of the entire country.  Please stay strong!

Sincerely,
me :)



The reason I wrote this is because they need to know they have our support and the issues are so true!  I am beyond pissed off at how the democrats and media is trying to put the blame on Republicans.  Now I am biased against Obama and the democrats, but I am still shocked at how they are acting.  Funny thing to note, my one democratic rep in DC, she has said her staff is nonessential, that way she can avoid public opinion of those she is supposed to represent (my opinion anyways).

CPAC St Louis after dinner

Twitter so limits me in the 140 characters that I decided to just make a short blog with all the info.  Please share this so everyone who is going or in the area can come (if they choose).

The meeting will be at Bandana's BBQ in Maryland Heights MO, on Dorsett St.  It is about a 6 mile drive from where CPAC is being held. 

The point of an after CPAC meet is for all of us who are interested to get to meet each other.  We can enjoy good food and good company.  It is also a chance for all of us to recharge our batteries.  CPAC may not give us the best opportunity to relax and just enjoy the company of other proud Americans. 

This is strictly an unofficial activity with no support given from any organization.  I will be there and I will be wearing my Mattis for President 2016 shirt.  I hope to see many of you great people from Twitter there (also at CPAC).

Directions are: 
You get back on Interstate 70 heading east. 
You then go south on Interstate 270.
Get off on Dorsett St, turn left, going under the freeway.
You will see Bandanas almost immediately on your right.
12222 Dorsett St. Maryland Heights MO

My 9-11 blog

This is a repeat of an old blog I wrote when I was left wing scum.  The reason I am digging this up is because today I was bombarded by a number of conspiracy theory nuts that want to say 9/11 was an inside job.  I do not have the patience to deal with such people so I just dug up something I wrote 7 years ago!  Please excuse grammar errors, my writing has improved as much as my politics (I hope).

This was originally written on:

Wednesday, April 5, 2006

Conspiracy Theories Again

It is truly sad the amount of time that must be spent attacking the illogicality of conspiracy theories.  However they keep popping up so I feel that time must be spent.  Because when a lie is believed the truth becomes a sacrifice.  Without truth we have no hope to go beyond this system of persecution that we are all victims of.  I say we are all victims of, because I truly doubt that anyone worth nine figures or more is reading my writings.

Let’s start with the missile theory and the Pentagon.  People claim that a missile was fired from a US Air Force plane or maybe that it was a cruise missile fired at the Pentagon.  Now explain to me why this would be done first?  People already got to see a plane crash into the Twin Towers live on television.  It was being replayed again, again and again.  Why did they need a second attack against the pentagon?  Also explain to me if many people believe that the planes were under remote control that hit the Twin Towers, why were not planes under remote control used against the pentagon?  As for there being no aircraft wreckage taken from the pentagon, there were no obvious pieces taken from the Twin Towers.  Planes are built to be as light as possible, because you are fighting powerful forces of gravity.  Planes, generally speaking disintegrate upon impact, because there is no safe way to fall to the earth at 600 plus miles per hour.  Think of the crash site in Pennsylvania, did you see giant sections of plane standing there?  The pieces were scattered over a large area.  So large in fact, if you want a conspiracy, think about the air force shooting that one down and afraid to admit they did it to this day.  Especially since the black box and cellular conversations showed the people chose to fight because they believed they were going to die anyways.  A plane did hit the pentagon, the wings folded in on itself and in the core of the impact (hidden by the smoke) the majority of the plane disintegrated.  As for the pretty pictures that show a computer or window undamaged.  If we had one hundred planes and one hundred pentagons, it is possible that we could have one hundred different results, because fire and explosions do not act according to what we consider logical.

World Trade Center.  Now this is going to be interesting to attack, because people (Alex Jones) are combining so much nonsense in this one section that even if one seemed possible, the combination of so much bullshit just makes the overall possibility ridiculous.  Remote control planes?  Now in itself I think you could argue that it is possible to use a remote control plane to hit the towers.  I would also have to agree that with the complexities of aerial traffic that a remote controlled plane would have about as much chance of hitting its target as a poorly trained person would with little experience flying such an aircraft.  However when you combine it with the theory that explosives were planted in the towers.  Then you got the problem of first planting enough explosives in the towers to make them crumble.  I have been under the towers at night when I lived in NYC.  Even at night there was a mass of activity at the towers.  Garbage going out, cleaning being done, supplies being brought in.  Well in this confusion could not explosives been brought in and planted?  Not really.  The amount of explosives needed would be such an amount that bringing them in and planting them would attract attention.  You would also have to use wireless communications since to leave wires everywhere would just risk attracting more attention.  Using wireless detonators in NYC is an extremely dangerous action.  Think of when you drive through a blasting area, you see signs that say, “turn off cell phones and two way radios.”  Now being the patriot I am, I am always talking on my cell or two way radio when I drive through such a zone.  The odds of causing such an explosion is very minor, however the more activity in the area, the greater the risk becomes.  NYC has a great amount of wireless activity.  Computer networks, cellular communications, two way radio communications, televisions, radio, etc…  I would have to say that NYC would be one of the last places you could safely turn on wireless detonators.  Timed detonators would have been even a worse idea.  This being what if there was some problems with one of the planes?  Now you have explosions taking place in a tower that was never hit!

There are also two more theories that need to be debunked.  First is the theory that jet fuel does not burn hot enough to melt the steel support beams.  I will agree with this.  Jet fuel cannot melt the steel support beams.  However the beams were not needed to be melted!  They only needed to get hot enough so the weight that was supported by them could no longer be done.  Thus gravity pulled the towers down.  As the beams in the center of the impact area buckled, the weight above came crashing down.  Next we got he video that those college kids put together comparing implosion buildings with what happened to the towers.  One of the main points everyone keeps repeating is the bursting of windows a few floors below collapse points like a planned implosion.  To understand why this happens is simple enough when you take in account the construction and design of the towers.  Now I am sure that an engineer or architect could explain this a hell of a lot better then I will.  However from the limited knowledge I have I will try my best.  When you build up, you need support from below, to help support the weight above.  This is why the most common first structures that towered into the sky were pyramids.  The provide enough base support to support the weight above them.  However when you are dealing with commercial properties, if you build too high you end up with two problems.  First is transporting people up the floors, because elevator space takes up rental space.  The other is the fact that support is needed for the weight above.  Now you have to remember that the towers used to be the tallest building in existence, and the way they overcame this problem was ingenious for the time.  The elevator problem was dealt with in stages.  You would go to one stage then have to take another elevator to another stage to thus get to your floor.  The support problem was dealt with in a way that proved very effective.  Instead of the entire structure being needed for support.  The main support was the outside of the building itself.  Almost like a house, you can tear down a wall inside your house to make a room bigger.  Because the main support is the outer walls.  Well thanks to modern steel this was able to be accomplished on the towers with a minimal of support needed inside of the outer core.  So as the towers fell, it was the inner part that collapsed first, because there was not as much support on the inside.  As all of this debris fell on the inside of each tower there was a natural tendency with each floor hit to cause an impact and thus force debris out through windows that were busted.

Finally building seven.  Now you may have me on this one, however I will take a guess.  Now everyone has heard of what became known as the bathtub.  The massive concrete structure that supported the weight of the towers underneath and provided a massive basement for parking and shipping receiving activity.  Now when did building seven collapse?  If it collapsed after the towers did, and it was above the bathtub, it is logical that so much damage was done below the surface that gravity did its job and brought down the building that could no longer support its own weight.

I have to wonder would there be so many illogical theories made up if this happened to a popular leader?  I do not believe so.  Even though Hitler and the Nazis were most likely responsible for the Reichstag fire, there was very little doubt given to the story that was put out for the population.

Now was Bush and the USA government responsible for the Twin Towers tragedy.  Yes, without a doubt.  Bush was responsible, Clinton was responsible, Bush Sr. was responsible, Reagan was responsible, Carter was responsible, etc…  The actions of the USA government to protect the economic investments of the richest citizens at the expense of the local peoples has caused such hatred and desire for revenge that it has fed the fire that led to Osama Bin Laden’s popularity and organization.  However to admit this would mean that the people would have to face the fact that they are not the good guys they want to believe they are.  The masses do not realize that they are being manipulated by a few people in power.  The actions of those few who desire only more wealth than they need and more power than they deserve does not affect an entire people.  Even the Germans were able to grow past the Nazis and rebuild not only their nation, but their reputation!  Only by bringing down the upper class that uses the rest of the people as mere pawns will the people be able to gain some sort of redemption.

As for Bush and his administration.  If it can be proved that they knew about the attack (even though not the scope of it) in advance and allowed it to happen just to further their agenda and control over the population.  That is about as close to direct responsibility as I believe you can get when attempting to compare it to planting the bombs that brought the towers down themselves.  That is of course unless you are willing to face the fact that every action (by the government) that has affected people adversely is another bomb waiting to explode.

Email I wrote to my DC reps

My DC Reps,

I am writing to you about the Syria situation that this administration is intent on escalating out of control.  I do not support this administration's endeavor and think we should stay out of the Syrian conflict.  Our involvement in Libya and Iraq is proof enough for us to stay out of it.  Iraq was a counter balance to Iran and by removing Saddam Hussein we in effect made Iran into a regional power.  Libya was stable, even if we did not agree with the government and now Libya is a mess!  We do not have a dog in the Syria fight, it is not in our national interest to get involved in it.  This is a battle between the Russian supported government and Iranian supported rebels.  Maybe if we got involved covertly early in the conflict we might have had some influence, however this is not the case. 

Let me be clear, I am not a pacifist hippie coward!  I believe we have the right to send our military anywhere in the world we choose to and dare anyone to stop us.  This right is paid for in the blood of our service members.  We should be 100% clear and focused if it is in our national interest to pay that cost.  I do not believe it is in our interest.  So I ask you to use your power and vote to place this administration on a short leash.  It is not the duty of our soldiers to protect the human rights of those who are not citizens of our country.

Thank you!
Room 101